澳洲堪培拉代写论文:华盛顿共识

Keywords:澳洲堪培拉代写论文

对华盛顿共识的批评进行了评价。私有化、放松管制和市场自由化政策未能促进经济增长吗？对华盛顿共识的批评是伟大的和多样的，主要是，它的目的是在一致的方式坚持的想法，由西方丰富的资本主义国家的政策本质上是“好”，应该作为一个模型，遵循的所有国家。通过迫使发展中国家，比如在南美国，或非洲，遵循这些规则以获得国际援助，争论的焦点是，这些经济体不必要的阻碍，通过压缩成适合西方发达经济体的格局，并迫使他们对外国商品和服务开放市场，当他们至少具备处理和接受。的共识，对经济是强加的效果已被证明是有害的，如在上世纪90年代早期的阿根廷经济危机，即使有正面效应同时发生。从广义上讲，华盛顿共识巩固了目前的局势，并帮助富裕国家的警察的共识，并提供援助的人实施它远远超过贫困国家最需要帮助。
澳洲堪培拉代写论文:华盛顿共识
Evaluate the criticism levelled against the Washington Consensus. Have the policies of privatisation, deregulation and market liberalisation failed to promote economic growth?The criticism against the Washington Consensus is great and varied; predominantly, it is aimed at the way in which the Consensus is stuck in the idea that the policies followed by rich western capitalist states are inherently ‘good’, and should, as a model, be followed by all countries. By forcing developing nations, such as in South America, or Africa, to follow these rules in order to gain international aid, the argument is made that these economies are unnecessarily hindered, by constricting them into a pattern that suits the developed Western economies, and forces them to open their markets to foreign goods and services when they are least well equipped to handle and accept them. The effects that the consensus has on economies it is forced upon have been shown to be detrimental, such as the Argentinean economic crisis of the early 1990s , even if there were positive side effects that occurred at the same time. Broadly speaking, the Washington Consensus reinforces the current situation, and aids the rich nations who police the consensus, and provide aid to those who implement it far more than the poor nations which are most in need of help.