昆士兰理工代写Assignment 网约提高形象
Keywords:昆士兰理工代写Assignment
之前的研究探讨了因素的网上约会者重视提高他们的印象。此前的研究发现，人们可以积极
（MIS）代表自己–如外表（波谢德，迪恩，沃尔特和沃尔特，1971）–尽可能理想的社会，使他们能吸引别人的一个日期（Brown，2007；罗，2011）。例如，增加的可能性，管理在线约会者的印象，无形中会导致在线约会的人提出一个理想自我（Cornwell和朗格，2001；Dovidio &法西奥，1992）–尤其是当他们不考虑最终的相遇，必须与人的预期相比。因此，在线约会的人已被证明是提高他们的外表，这样的活动可能被夸大，当这样的人不考虑未来，他们在其中会遇到潜在的合作伙伴都只给出描述/信息和文艺热点轮廓图像被张贴在网站上（Ellison et al.。2006）。
然而，正如戈夫曼（1971）总结了关系人互动，启动时通过面对面或通过其他媒介的沟通，而当人交往过一段时间。在线浪漫关系包括启动和发展，在这期间通常需要承诺.。这样带来的问题是，如果人们开始网上约会，他们认识到他们可以面对面见面的情况下，将这些人（MIS）代表自己因为别人有意识或无意识地选择日期根据肤浅的社会期望（波谢德et al.，1971）？
为了更好地理解虚拟现象（MIS）表示，各种研究探索自我报告的原因是在线约会的欺骗，或通过CMC测试自我呈现理论（Ellison et al.，2006；埃利森，史坦因费德，& Lampe，2012；Garc，2014；í，Guadagno，muscanell，&波利奥，2013；托马，汉考克和Ellison，2008），包括网上约会者的判断对他们的吸引力（托马·汉考克，2010）。
很少有研究调查方法中的印象管理可以影响他人和被新技术交流平台如CMC含量的影响（Ellison et al.，2006）。例如，混合通信模式的形状的印象管理策略，在线约会的人使用的框架和实践外表印象管理的描述（Goffman，1959）对他人。传统上，身体吸引力是其中焦点报道当个人明确自己的理由选择一个可能的匹配（Cornwell et al.，2001；翁，贝尔伊德，和沃尔特，1972；白，1980）。反过来，外表往往是由社会称许性定义（Leary et al.，1990；内扎莱克& Leary，2002）；或者说，它是指物理属性，文化觊觎。
昆士兰理工代写Assignment 网约提高形象
Prior research has explored factors online daters pay additional attention to improving their impressions. Prior research has found that people could positively
(mis)represent themselves–such as physical appearance (Berscheid, Dion, Walter, & Walter, 1971) – to be as socially desirable as possible, so that they could entice others for a date (Brown, 2007; Rosenbloom, 2011). For example, the increased likelihood to manage online daters’ impressions invisibly may lead online daters to present an ideal self (Cornwell & Lundgren, 2001; Dovidio & Fazio, 1992) – especially when they are not considering eventually meeting each other and must be compared with that person’s expectations. As a result, online daters have been shown to enhance their physical appearance and such activity may be exaggerated when such daters are not considering the future, within which they would meet prospective partners who have been given only the description/information and literately a hot shot profile image that has been posted on the website (Ellison et al. 2006).
However, as Goffman (1971) summarizes, a relationship initiates when people interact via face-to-face or by other-mediated communication, and it develops when people interact over a period of time. The online romantic relationship involves initiation as well as development, during which commitment is typically required. So the question is posed that if people initiate online dating on the condition that they recognize they may be able to meet face-to-face, will those same people (mis)represent themselves because others consciously or subconsciously prefer to date according to superficial social desirability (Berscheid et al., 1971)?
In order to better understand the phenomenon of virtual (mis)representation, various studies have either explored self-reported reasons for online dating deception, or tested self-presentation theory through CMC (Ellison et al., 2006; Ellison, Steinfield, & Lampe, 2012; García, 2014; Guadagno, Muscanell, & Pollio, 2013; Toma, Hancock, & Ellison, 2008), including online daters’ judgments on their attractiveness (Toma & Hancock, 2010).
Fewer studies have investigated methods in which impression management can influence others and are influenced by the content in new technological communication platforms such as CMC (Ellison et. al., 2006). For instance, mixed mode communication shapes impression management strategies that online daters use to frame the description of physical appearances and practice impression management (Goffman, 1959) on others. Traditionally, physical attractiveness is among the foci reported when individuals clarify their reasons for selecting a possible match (Cornwell et al., 2001; Dion, Berscheid, &Walter, 1972; White, 1980). In turn, physical attractiveness is often defined by social desirability (Leary et al., 1990; Nezlek & Leary, 2002); or rather, it refers to physical attributes that are culturally coveted.
